Now now more BS. I can point to that it was discussed on FR and elsewhere. You hung yourself in post 110 and hey obfuscator, you hung yourself again in post 116 too.
No, you simply can’t point to pre-November 2008 discussions of ‘two-citizen-parent’ claims.
You got called on your nonsense.
Here it is again troll-bot.
LOL. Like a typical birther, when confronted with evidence that your argument is dead wrong, you baselessly dismiss it.
I can point to that it was discussed on FR and elsewhere.
No you can't.
You hung yourself in post 110 and hey obfuscator, you hung yourself again in post 116 too.
Actually, no. In both those posts, LorenC totally demolished your argument, your protestations not withstanding.
LorenC: No, you simply can’t point to pre-November 2008 discussions of ‘two-citizen-parent’ claims.
Red Steel: You got called on your nonsense.
No he did not. You simply cannot produce a single example of anyone making an eligibility argumetn based on the supposed two citizen parent requirement.
Here it is again troll-bot.
Nope. Freedom of Speech Wins was not making the two-citizen parent argument, no matter how often you say otherwise.