I'm not their spokesmodel, so you need to take it up with them...but they appear to be unconvinced of the birther's natural born citizen argument.
First you tell me that because Landmark and Heritage won't pursue this, I should accept that as truth and move on. Then you tell me you can't speak for them and I need to question them directly? You obviously are convinced - what was it that convinced you they're right not to pursue it?
Bear with me, please. Hopefully you recognize that I am not a regular on the "birther" threads and I'm coming at this as one who silently questions what the real truth is. I just want to know the truth. Is it that even if Obama wasn't born in Hawaii, he's still a NBC because of his mom's citizenship? Or do they believe he was indeed born in Hawaii?
I don't believe Landmark or Heritage are part of any conspiracy. I don't think it's unreasonable for them not to want to pursue something that has no chance of really being answered truthfully. I'm trying to think this through.
Why can't we just see an official Birth Certificate? Not this person saw that this person had that on file and "trust me, I'm from the government and I'm here to tell you the truth". Do you believe they indeed have the documentation and are keeping their powder dry for the most opportune moment? If so, isn't that a conspiracy theory in it's own right? All these officials who supposedly know the truth, but are keeping it under wraps in order to help Obama?
Too many unanswered questions to sit idly by and accept it, sorry.