Can you put together a very clear and concise argument for the NBC issue, maybe even a paragraph in length, that is devastatingly convincing? Something that can be spoken easily and in just a few minutes?
Thanks for your reply. I’m going to be away from the computer for most of the evening. If I can reply tonight I’ll plan to, but I may not be able to send you an answer until tomorrow. Your questions were excellent, though, and I look forward to discussing the issues you raised.
Why Obama is ineligible regardless of his birthplace
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=134881
Obama May Be a Born Naturalized Citizen but Not a Natural Born Citizen
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/obama-may-be-born-naturalized-citizen.html
NBC Means Unity of Citizenship at Birth
I don't know if that's possible to convince the anti-"Birthers" because for obvious reasons. If I did put together a super tight argument, they won't admit that they are convinced even if they are. Their goal is to keep Obama in office at just about all costs and for other emotional reasons.
To quote DJ MacWoW from this thread. "One of the Founding Fathers could stand in front of them and tell them that Bam isnt eligible and theyd argue it."
However, I'd have to give the idea some thought.
Fact: It is simple to prove one’s natural born status
Fact: Obama has **never** proved his natural born status.
Fact: Ordinary Americans prove it with common and easily accessible documents. They do so for many reasons that are far less vital than being president.