Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DJ MacWoW
Again, the SCOTUS is referring to international law. No one denies that Vattel’s book had to do with international law, hence it's title. Now just because SCOTUS cites this book in a case of first impression involving the international abduction of a drug dealer to the USA to stand trial is not unusual. That gives zero credence to the idea that SCOTUS will use Vattel’s book if they decide to take another case regarding NBC. Since it is well established and settled law that if you are born in the USA, then you are a NBC, it highly doubtful SCOTUS will grant cert in a birther case regarding this issue. SCOTUS rarely, if ever, accepts case when the legal precedent goes back over 100 years unless there are conflicting CCA opinions. There are none in this situation and doubtful there will be after over 80 cases.
259 posted on 01/03/2011 7:39:17 PM PST by TNTNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]


To: Nachum; Zionist Conspirator; TNTNT

Nachum and ZC, do either of you have the time or inclination to look at post 246? This newbie is discussing Israeli law, and I would like to know if he’s got it right. Thank you in advance.


260 posted on 01/03/2011 7:44:15 PM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

To: TNTNT

Horse feathers. It states that Vattel was used in the beginning of this nation. You been owned retread.


261 posted on 01/03/2011 7:47:45 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson