First, what is with this "did'nt instead of the correct "didn't"? Perhaps it is a typo but I see it so often I am beginning to think many people are being mistaught by our schools.
The media refused to cover not only credible but slam dunk evidence of rape and frequent cocaine use by Bill Clinton, instead suggesting the Bush's were drug dealers using their own plane to personally fly drugs from Columbia to the USA.
They raised Holy Hell about the suggestion that someone in GHW Bush's State Department looked at the Clintons' passport information but down played Hillary's illegal use of private FBI files on political enemies.
The media did not investigate the dead woman whose nude body was found in a Congressional office nor Vince Fosters suspicious death, other than to help in the cover-up, were disinterested in Ron Brown's death in a suspicious plane crash, and made only passing note of the many stolen laptops with classified information under Clinton.
Who checked Al Gore's background before he became VP? Had they, they would have found the direct link between the Gores and Armand and Julius Hammer, the founders of the Communist Party USA, and the connections to Vladimir Lenin. Arthur Sulzberger, Publisher of the New York Times had the same connections.
Why would we think they would treat Obama any differently?
They will destroy conservatives and elect any Marxist no matter how tainted.
However, this time they went too far, probably thinking the American people would be as misinformed as ever and would not raise a stink. They were ambushed by the Tea Party Movement. As a result, we will be much better at getting the truth out.
The Democrats are having one last hoorah. They are ramming through everything they can, expecting for at least 60% of it to never get repealed. Obama is just a figurehead who will not be back because next time the birth certificate thing will not go away. So, the Obamas are enjoying life to the max on taxpayer expense until the ride is over. Throwing that in our face is of particular pleasure to them.
Hillary won't be around either. She will be too tainted by the Marxists connection to Saul Alinsky and Rules for Radicals, having done her college thesis on it. Add to that her further antics in the WH, Vince Foster, the FBI files, etc., and she will disappear into the political archives. She will not be able to stand the scrutiny she will receive form the conservatives next time around.
That leaves pretty clear sailing for whomever the Republicans nominate for 2012, unless the Marxists take a last stand and create a situation that allows them to declare martial law and cancel the elections. Don't poo poo that idea, it might just happen.
My fears exactly. Put nothing past Obama, he is perfectly capable of turning his “Presidency” into a dictatorship. I believe this with all of my heart. He cares not a whit what the public want, only what he believes is right for the poor of this country. Castro was also concerned for the poor and now he has succeeded in making them more poor than they were before he took power at the end of a gun. Redistribution of
wealth may be a fine ideal but when the generators of wealth have nothing left to redistribute the only possible outcome
can be poverty for all. Will this be Obamas legacy?