Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jagusafr
Col. If this were a true repeal, wouldn't we be reverting to the policy as it was before slick Willie declared Homosexuality in the Military to be optional?
16 posted on 12/27/2010 8:15:37 AM PST by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: ASA Vet

“If this were a true repeal, wouldn’t we be reverting to the policy as it was before slick Willie declared Homosexuality in the Military to be optional?”

Yes - that’s been the misrepresentation from the beginning: 10 USC 654 simply codified the policy that practicing homosexuals will be discharged. With its repeal, we should go back to how things were before its implementation, which is stated in the repealed statuts as follows:

(13) The prohibition against homosexual conduct is a longstanding element of military law that continues to be necessary in the unique circumstances of military service.

By repealing DADT, they didn’t repeal the “longstanding element of military law”.

Colonel, USAFR


22 posted on 12/27/2010 8:49:26 AM PST by jagusafr ("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson