I consider these races repudiations of Sarah as much as the nominees.
That is not to say that I don't think the world of Sarah Palin -- her Christian convictions, her beauty and charm, and her valliant struggle against the libs.
BUT I want the best candidate possible to face the Party of Appeasement, Sleaze and Deceit in 2012.
So you point out three candidates and neglect all the others that won with her backing...and this is your argument?
conservatives lover her....its the elitest country club pubbies that dont like her...a big difference.
Why don't you look at the full record of Palin endorsed candidates instead of cherry picking candidates from the three best Democrat races.
Your analysis of this election is woefully inadequate. Those candidates were not “chosen” by Sarah Palin. They chose to run and she chose to endorse them over liberal and/or moderate opponents. Exactly who would you have backed? The winners in those races?