I’m not familiar with Anthony G. Martin. Anyone?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Then we have some dude named Joe Baron penning this piece quoting an anonymous inside source claiming anonymous UM has no anonymous inside sources. (Can’t make this stuff up! LOL)
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/6014030/ulsterman_articles_revealed_to_be_hoax.html?cat=9
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FWIW, I’m told UM claims “computer problems” are dogging posting part II of his last installment.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In other news:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2629500/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2629727/posts
There are people on UM’s FB page saying they think UM’s writing pattern with or without dots?.... I forget which? has changed.... so they think his FB page has been taken over...
LOL
So what does Sean Hannity say? He had the exact same story, from “reliable sources”.
I would expect the White House to put a straw man out to try to diss UM.
Note that Joe Baron only shows as authoring one article. This one. White House plant?
This is pretty amusing. Ulsterman’s articles don’t pass the “sniff” test, but this one stinks from a mile away.
The name sounds very familiar, but I can’t remember who he use to be connected with. Perhaps Judicial Watch or Western Center Journalism?
—Did he bring us to the brink (even though we though it was fiction, but a good read) and then stop in a ‘Gotcha’ moment?
—Did he stop because people were getting close to his identity?
—Was someone setting him up for a fall?
Chinese Checkers.
I am. He is a conservative commentator on Examiner.com. He is one of those in the white hats.
Good man as far as I know.
I think Baron, who ever he is, is running a discredit scheme.
If anyone there is a fraud, thus far its baron. Too much has proved accurate from the insider. That speaks for itself.