Posted on 11/18/2010 10:10:32 PM PST by Nachum
New information has been uncovered by investigators delving into the looming White House/Department of Justice/Chicago political mob scandal.
My latest video, posted in the left column, provides the details.
Several items are worth noting.
First, the New Black Panther voter intimidation case at the Department of Justice is only the tip of the iceberg. There is good reason and evidence to suspect that the Democratic Party has engaged in nationwide voter fraud and election tampering on a scale never before seen in American politics. The players allegedly involved are named in the video.
Second, a separate scandal is developing regarding the Chicago political mob of which Barack Obama is a key figure. Valerie Jarrett, perhaps Obama's closest White House adviser, owns a real estate venture in Chicago that is allegedly under suspicion for corruption.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
I am wondering if Yahoo! checked Mr. Baron’s credentials?
The name sounds very familiar, but I can’t remember who he use to be connected with. Perhaps Judicial Watch or Western Center Journalism?
http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/are-deep-throat-and-ulsterman-legit-you-decide
Anthony G. Martin
Are ‘deep throat’ and ‘Ulsterman’ legit? You decide
* November 18th, 2010 12:25 pm ET
—Did he bring us to the brink (even though we though it was fiction, but a good read) and then stop in a ‘Gotcha’ moment?
—Did he stop because people were getting close to his identity?
—Was someone setting him up for a fall?
Chinese Checkers.
This is Baron’s first Yahoo! article.
Showing Result 1 (of 1).
Ulsterman Articles Revealed to Be Hoax
November 18, 2010
The mysterious blogger known only as Ulsterman has a series of popular content. The only problem is, his “White House Insider” is completely made up.
I maintain that Joe Baron is the hoax.
They could BOTH be hoaxes. Ball is in UM’s court. Let’s see if he addresses this.
bookmark
“Ball is in UMs court.”
Maybe Hillary can lend him one. LOL!
I think this is just psy-ops. Whether or not Ulsterman's insider is real, Baron is trying to discredit him because he's not happy with the "insider's" claims.
Or, he's just trying to make a point: Baron can make up stories just as easily as Ulsterman.
If Ulsterman wants to become the next Woodward and Bernstein, his "Deep Throat" is eventually going to have to offer something substantive.
I disagree. UM has been writing for quite a while and has some credibility with the accuracy. Joe Baron has written one article? Where is his source? “Anonymous” of course.
LMAO!
Those same thugs were outside the courtroom at the Duke Lacrosse false rape accusation hearings as well. They were outside trying to intimidate the “whitey” players.
LMDPO!!!
Or, he's just trying to make a point: Baron can make up stories just as easily as Ulsterman.
If Ulsterman wants to become the next Woodward and Bernstein, his "Deep Throat" is eventually going to have to offer something substantive.
Joe Baron has written exactly one article: This one. He has no track record, no history, nada. He is a fake.
UM has been writing since 2009, that is a plus for him. I am not married to one side of the coin or the other. It is fun in a ‘watch-the-neighbors-fight-on-the-front-lawn’ sort of way. :-)
I think Joe Baron is a White House fireman “Johnny Come Lately” trying to create confusion and damage control by attempting to undermine UM. Yet they offer nothing solid either. Will Joe Baron try to discredit Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh also? They reported the same story.
I wonder how many FBI moles there are?
http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/786015,CST-NWS-mole10.article
Will Joe Baron try to discredit Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh also? They reported the same story.
Regardless of who the bad guy is, perhaps we have been wrong in thinking Obama is the main target in this. Perhaps the real targets are Rush and Hannity?
The Insider could be the true bad guy. He could be using UM as a way to destroy their credibility. Joe Baron coud be the WHI for all we know.
So many possibilities. So much imagination. :-)
Well, I did not hear Rush Limbaugh’s segment. I did hear Sean Hannity say that he got this from a “very reliable source” so Sean is now responsible. Let’s see how it plays out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.