I agree, and at any rate it is quite vexing that in this age of “information overload” there should be any question at all, one way or the other.
Think about the video from Channel 2, which was actually a video of the news anchors blabbing about the video playing in the background, of which we only actually saw a few seconds. Then of course there was video of them showing it to what’s-his-name - the old guy, and we saw almost none of this.
What about the raw video? How long was it? If it was a jet contrail, this would be very apparent from a few minutes of continuous tracking. And what about the testimony of the videographer? How much video did he take? How long did he watch? The whole thing is ridiculous and comes very close to a hoax perpetrated by the TV station, if indeed they are sitting on a longer video record, or other evidence, that makes the case clear.
To news people, nothing is real, everything is just a story.
“What about the raw video? How long was it? If it was a jet contrail, this would be very apparent from a few minutes of continuous tracking. And what about the testimony of the videographer? How much video did he take? How long did he watch? The whole thing is ridiculous and comes very close to a hoax perpetrated by the TV station, if indeed they are sitting on a longer video record, or other evidence, that makes the case clear.”
Lets see the whole “around ten minutes” footage. Why isn’t that out there? Is the guy holding out for money? I can’t blame him, but it adds to the hype either way.
Freegards