Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: speciallybland
“This doesn't exactly make her a “cheater” though, does it?”

If you are referring to her accepting the cross-over democrat vote, no, that's not cheating. The article reads like the author takes exception to her willingness to deprive a candidacy resulting from a republican primary process because she didn't like the results. I think she is called a cheater because she “cheated” the majority of republicans (as in primary voting republicans)out of their chosen candidate. In effect, we had the republican primary all over again, this time with democrats allowed to vote in it. Thus the cheater referance.

21 posted on 11/04/2010 5:24:27 AM PDT by Gum Shoe (You live to serve this ship. Row well, and live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Gum Shoe

God Help Mitch McConnell if he accepts Murkowski in the Republican caucus! Let her survive as a Democrat.


24 posted on 11/04/2010 5:29:12 AM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson