Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

“The point was that Meg Whitman was a liberal that ran on a pro-abortion, anti-gun platform.”

So are you suggesting that Meg lost because she leaned left on these two issues? That was inconsequential. Did you read the posted article, the theme of which was about a state stuck on stupid that once again elected Governor Moonbeam, the same politican who failed them before and left a path of economic destruction in his wake? Kalifornia is a lost cause.


85 posted on 11/04/2010 4:14:50 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: Starboard

What I keep reading is your defense of Meg Whitman, you seem unbothered by her platform, or her politics, she was the wrong person to lead the GOP efforts in California with her 150 million dollar campaign.


86 posted on 11/04/2010 4:30:41 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: Starboard

She lost, because she never could be bothered to vote, which is an American citizen’s sacred trust.

She’s a globalist, so voting never mattered to her, until she decided that being governor would be good for her pocketbook.

No conservative can support a candidate like that.


87 posted on 11/04/2010 4:33:12 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson