Posted on 11/03/2010 1:32:28 PM PDT by The Comedian
...
The new information comes in the form of some date changes, and two significant alterations to the release language period. First, the date changes.
The emotional tension level plateau is has grown. It had been previously forecast to start on the 8th, but now shows as beginning on November 5, 2010, at approximately 2:30 PM Pacific Coast Time (UTC + 8). Further, the plateau of building emotional tension now extends out further to the 14th of November instead of the 11th. This is the last building tension to accrue. Expect the level to stay maddeningly the same until the breaking point.
Repeat. The 'break' in the tension values that indicates the tipping point after which we (the planet of humans) is into emotional release language starts on November 14th at 6:50AM Pacific Coast Time (UTC + 8). Repeat - Tipping point starts on 11-14-2010.
(Excerpt) Read more at halfpasthuman.com ...
None-the-less I still appreciate you putting this out there.
The best that can happen is that you are totally wrong, wrong, wrong. In which case you are risking that most terrible of all Human Fates, ridicule.
I applaud your courage and willingness to take that risk.
Well there is some strange things happening in the Hollywood crowd...bizzare episode of The Simpsons seems to have some strange overtones in it.
Definitely something bad could happen in the next 3 weeks...none of this looks positive in the near-term...however long term we will make America great again.
Amen. "All one in Christ Jesus."
And I plan to wake up Nov 9, and have a wonderful day
Me, too. As will the nation of Israel, I'd bet.
I understand zip about your post, but I love the way you say it. 8~)
Thanks bud.
Yup, exactly.
I fully believe in the intellectual value of the scientific method, and the scary importance of peer review.
If I fail, it only proves that my theory is falsifiable (and therefor a structurally valid, if incorrect, theory), and if I'm right, it becomes public record.
Fascinating, didn't know that.
Thanks for your kind reply.
Just interesting puzzle piece collecting and watching . . .
I’d think that special efforts like that would be a few drops in a hurricane tsunami.
True.
And both Clif and I make a special effort to screen purposeful intent out of the linguistic ocean to get to the subconscious, subtle stuff within.
Like filtering out whales to get to the plankton.
I don’t think the webbot software gets terms
“at random”
I think it’s fairly exhaustive and comprehensive in searching out super massive quantities of text and getting as many of the 300,000 terms in it’s list as it can find.
I don’t even think it’s totally accurate to call that a sampling. Given errors and what not, it’s probably not the absolute total of those words on the net. Though I think that for all practical purposes, the “sample” size is functionally equal to the total, for all practical purposes.
However, I’m guessing. TC can set me right where I’m wrong.
In this? I seriously doubt it as well, but it does illustrate the fact that evil people/entities can and do distort the web for their purposes.
Of course.
And that would be different from average
uhhhhhhhhhh . . . reality
how?
Perhaps it depends on who “we” is.
But mostly, I don’t think that’s accurate.
God will redeem the remnants of this once great land after Armageddon. He will likely use some FREEPERS in the doings.
Thanks, Bro.
I love to guess accurately.
Well, we’re commanded to watch, so I’m with you there. 8~)
You have perked my ears up quite a bit with your revelation that you do something similar. Is this just a hobby of yours? You must be a real geek to take on something so intense for fun. :D
Any way, I find your ideas intriguing and wish to subscribe to your newsletter. Or if you have a ping list, that would work too.
YEA FOR THAT.
. . . AND TO LOOK UP, FOR OUR REDEMPTION DRAWS NEAR.
He’ll likely speak for himself when he gets around to it.
Until then . . . IIRC, he has NO newsletter nor any other publishing outlet than FR.
He is working on his PhD in this field—a bit older than some to be doing so.
He is a hot-shot programmer by training and trade.
Which, of course, means he’s no slouch in mathematics either.
He’s trying to remove as much of the subjective interpretive guess work from the process as possible—and just let the data speak whatever the data will speak.
Given that it’s linguistics . . . and gleaning clusters and meaning out of such massive amounts of text is not exactly as easy as falling off a log . . . keeping the process clear and clean of inference and subjective interpretation may not be a simple matter. Nevertheless, he’s determined to make it a minimal part and a last step bit owned as such instead of such a major part as it seems to be with so much of Cliff’s output.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.