Clinton DADT policy is like trying to get a butt in a room, pretending that the a hole is not attached to it.
Either ban them or accept them.
You can ban a person with a tattoo, you can ban anybody. DADT is nonsense - a person is either able or not able to serve.
DADT is saying - you are not able but don’t tell anybody and you will be fine. It is pure nonsense.
Answer the question.
I agree that DADT is bad. But allowing "open" homosexuals in the military is infinitely worse. The military should be a "homosexual-free" zone - NO TOLERANCE WHATSOEVER!
“a person is either able or not able to serve.”
While that may, or may not, be true you are leaving an important distinction out of your consideration. The number one issue that is not being discussed is UNIT COHESION.
What do you think will happen when you spend 8 weeks breaking down young men and the rebuilding them to be violent killing machines, then you force those same people to share a shower head with a homosexual male?
Can you envision the destruction to UNIT COHESION?