Thank you.
My point is, you cannot answer the question: Do you think all straight should serve in the military?
Military evaluates their applications and denies or approves them.
It should be the same process for all people.
if the military evaluates one gay to be able to serve - I am fine with it.
If somebody is willing to serve - the person should be respected.
DADT is dishonest, disrespectful policy that only dysfunctional Congress can come up with - half gay - half not gay policy.
Every other country either accepts them or does not accept them. Only we have: i don’t see what I see cowardly policy.
No problem.
I can answer that question. No.
It should be the same process for all people. if the military evaluates one gay to be able to serve - I am fine with it.
Actaully before DADT it was, all people were to be hetrosexual for one thing. I agree it is dishonest, but I don't agree that homeosexuals deserve to serve. I happen to be in the camp that it is a chosen lifestyle, therefore their choice not to serve.
Every other country either accepts them or does not accept them. Only we have: i don’t see what I see cowardly policy
I see your point here. and agree
Here are four articles that explain why homosexuals should not be in the military. Please read them and then explain why they should be allowed without the little butt-covering “if the military thinks they should” fakery. The military does not think homosexuals should be allowed to serve and they have said so repeatedly. The only ones who think they should are some higher up Perfumed Prince career guys who either have no clue or are weird themselves, and are willing to kiss administration butt to help their own careers.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608370/posts
In Support the 1993 Law Stating that Homosexuals are not Eligible to Serve in the Military
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2608320/posts
Court Cases Reveal the Destructive Effects of Homosexual Misconduct [In the Military]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608306/posts
Rates of Homosexual Assault in the Military Are Disproportionately High
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608193/posts
Homosexual Assault in the Military
So you are saying that "straight" people and homosexual perverts are not in any way different from each other. Funny thing, pretty much the only people who use the term "straight" are homosexuals. It should be the same process for all people. if the military evaluates one gay to be able to serve - I am fine with it.
Apparently this is what you want - homosexuals to be allowed to serve in the military as long as they can do sit-ups, read, write, etc. Now you're being a bit more honest.
If somebody is willing to serve - the person should be respected.
Why should anyone be respected just because they're willing to serve in the military? Plenty of people are not qualified to serve in the military and if they're honest and know they are not, they should not be respected? Your point is very unclear.
DADT is dishonest, disrespectful policy that only dysfunctional Congress can come up with - half gay - half not gay policy.
Clinton came up with it because the country wasn't "ready" for flagrant perversion in the military. It is disrespectful to the normal men and women in the military, correct. But that's probably not what you meant. Furthermore, having "open" homosexuals in the military will be even more disrespectful to the normal men and women, in fact, driving many of them out of the military.
Every other country either accepts them or does not accept them. Only we have: i don’t see what I see cowardly policy.
Wagglebee has said repeatedly and I agree - so what if other countries allow mentally ill sexual perverts into the military? The United States of America is a sovereign nation and only leftist scum like Judge Ginsberg (for example) want to model our country's laws and customs on other countries' leftist agendas! Read the article I posted a link to about the General testifying in front of Congress! NATO commanders told him that homosexuals in the military harm readiness and morale! Apparently you want to harm readiness and morale in the US military, just to promote the homosexual agenda.