Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Code Pink Disrupts Condoleeza Rice in San Francisco (Video)
hap ^ | 10/18/10 | HAP

Posted on 10/18/2010 5:14:26 PM PDT by Talkradio03

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Ronald_Magnus

I doubt that’s an actual Code Pinko member. It looks like a photoshop.


21 posted on 10/18/2010 6:20:21 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ETL

“I doubt that’s an actual Code Pinko member. It looks like a photoshop.”

Looking at it closely, you might be right.


22 posted on 10/18/2010 6:23:56 PM PDT by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Talkradio03
My only encounter with code pinko was in Washington on April 15...

Funny thing is, I was carrying two cameras with different lenses on each. She apparently thought at first that I was media and started approaching. Then she saw my bright yellow "Tyranny Response Team" tee shirt and quickly turned away.

23 posted on 10/18/2010 6:30:56 PM PDT by meyer (Tax the productive to carry the freeloaders - What is it with democrats and slavery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

I’m surprised that Condi didn’t just deck the commie. I would have, which is probably why I’m not in politics.


24 posted on 10/18/2010 6:32:52 PM PDT by meyer (Tax the productive to carry the freeloaders - What is it with democrats and slavery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: meyer

Notice the ‘Obama 08’ endorsement on the front wheel, opposite side.


25 posted on 10/18/2010 6:36:27 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: meyer

I saw her at a Communist Party USA/”Peace Action” anti-nukes rally in New York’s Times Square on May 2. Their goal was/is to disarm America.


26 posted on 10/18/2010 6:40:26 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ETL; cripplecreek
They’re both commie left (Obama and Code Pink). That is why they don’t protest him much.

That was cripplecreek's point.

Nobody understands the depravity of the Left like the Left does.

Code Pink knows if they make so much as a face at Barry, they're liable to wake up suicided in the trunks of their cars, Chicago style.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

27 posted on 10/18/2010 6:41:40 PM PDT by The Comedian (Don't run. You'll just die tired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian

They did make some meek little noises about Obama not immediately defeunding the military but I suspect somebody got a dead fish in the mail and they got the message.


28 posted on 10/18/2010 6:44:43 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Color them ugly. I will never buy/wear pink again....


29 posted on 10/18/2010 7:02:28 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus

This isn’t against the law?


30 posted on 10/18/2010 7:03:19 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: meyer

“”I’m surprised that Condi didn’t just deck the commie””

Keep your eye on Condi...she’s not what we thought. See her latest interviews explaining away everything obozo does. She’s into the color thing too and I don’t mean PINK! A part of her is being revealed never seen before. Had me and a lot of other people fooled. Big disappointment!!!


31 posted on 10/18/2010 7:06:18 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Talkradio03

The same Condi who is defending Obama? Oh well.


32 posted on 10/18/2010 7:12:22 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talkradio03
From the New York Times
Feb 14, 2016

Transcript of the Republican Presidential Debate

TRUMP: You do whatever you want. You call it whatever you want. I want to tell you. They lied. They said there were weapons of mass destruction, there were none. And they knew there were none. There were no weapons of mass destruction.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/14/us/politics/transcript-of-the-republican-presidential-debate.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

______________________________________________

NY Times discovers that Saddam did have WMDs after all

By Thomas Lifson

President Bush "lied" about Iraq's WMDs - thus goes the article of faith among liberals, endlessly repeated by the likes of Ron Fournier and Jon Stewart as a kind of progressive catechism.  Except that it is a libel, as even the New York Times indirectly acknowledges today.

C.J. Chivers and Eric Schmitt write:

The Central Intelligence Agency, working with American troops during the occupation of Iraq, repeatedly purchased nerve-agent rockets from a secretive Iraqi seller, part of a previously undisclosed effort to ensure that old chemical weapons remaining in Iraq did not fall into the hands of terrorists or militant groups, according to current and former American officials.

The extraordinary arms purchase plan, known as Operation Avarice, began in 2005 and continued into 2006, and the American military deemed it a nonproliferation success. It led to the United States' acquiring and destroying at least 400 Borak rockets, one of the internationally condemned chemical weapons that Saddam Hussein's Baathist government manufactured in the 1980s but that were not accounted for by United Nations inspections mandated after the 1991 Persian Gulf war.

Note that despite the firestorm of slander the Bush administration endured over its "lies" on WMD, the president never acted to declassify the information on the CIA buyback program, and as a result today it is an article of faith on the left that he lied us into war.

At the time of the invasion of Iraq, there was no way to know that:

These munitions were remnants of an Iraqi special weapons program that was abandoned long before the 2003 invasion,

But:

 they turned up sporadically during the American occupation in buried caches, as part of improvised bombs or on black markets.

American Thinker reported on the WMD evidence found in Iraq 11 years ago.  

The CIA's program appears to have put at risk soldiers who were not warned of the risks they faced in handling these potent weapons:

Not long after Operation Avarice had secured its 400th rocket, in 2006, American troops were exposed several times to other chemical weapons. Many of these veterans said that they had not been warned by their units about the risks posed by the chemical weapons and that their medical care and follow-up were substandard, in part because military doctors seemed unaware that chemical munitions remained in Iraq.

In some cases, victims of exposure said, officers forbade them to discuss what had occurred. The Pentagon now says hundreds of other veterans reported on health-screening forms that they believed they too had been exposed during the war.

Aaron Stein, an associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, said the belated acknowledgment of a chemical-rocket purchases, as well as the potentially worrisome laboratory analysis of the related sarin samples, raised questions about the military's commitment to the well-being of those it sent to war.

We have been fed a line of bull over Saddam and WMDs.

President Bush "lied" about Iraq's WMDs - thus goes the article of faith among liberals, endlessly repeated by the likes of Ron Fournier and Jon Stewart as a kind of progressive catechism.  Except that it is a libel, as even the New York Times indirectly acknowledges today.

C.J. Chivers and Eric Schmitt write:

The Central Intelligence Agency, working with American troops during the occupation of Iraq, repeatedly purchased nerve-agent rockets from a secretive Iraqi seller, part of a previously undisclosed effort to ensure that old chemical weapons remaining in Iraq did not fall into the hands of terrorists or militant groups, according to current and former American officials.

The extraordinary arms purchase plan, known as Operation Avarice, began in 2005 and continued into 2006, and the American military deemed it a nonproliferation success. It led to the United States' acquiring and destroying at least 400 Borak rockets, one of the internationally condemned chemical weapons that Saddam Hussein's Baathist government manufactured in the 1980s but that were not accounted for by United Nations inspections mandated after the 1991 Persian Gulf war.

Note that despite the firestorm of slander the Bush administration endured over its "lies" on WMD, the president never acted to declassify the information on the CIA buyback program, and as a result today it is an article of faith on the left that he lied us into war.

At the time of the invasion of Iraq, there was no way to know that:

These munitions were remnants of an Iraqi special weapons program that was abandoned long before the 2003 invasion,

But:

 they turned up sporadically during the American occupation in buried caches, as part of improvised bombs or on black markets.

American Thinker reported on the WMD evidence found in Iraq 11 years ago.  

The CIA's program appears to have put at risk soldiers who were not warned of the risks they faced in handling these potent weapons:

Not long after Operation Avarice had secured its 400th rocket, in 2006, American troops were exposed several times to other chemical weapons. Many of these veterans said that they had not been warned by their units about the risks posed by the chemical weapons and that their medical care and follow-up were substandard, in part because military doctors seemed unaware that chemical munitions remained in Iraq.

In some cases, victims of exposure said, officers forbade them to discuss what had occurred. The Pentagon now says hundreds of other veterans reported on health-screening forms that they believed they too had been exposed during the war.

Aaron Stein, an associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, said the belated acknowledgment of a chemical-rocket purchases, as well as the potentially worrisome laboratory analysis of the related sarin samples, raised questions about the military's commitment to the well-being of those it sent to war.

We have been fed a line of bull over Saddam and WMDs.

source:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/02/ny_times_discovers_that_saddam_did_have_wmds_after_all.html


33 posted on 02/15/2016 8:39:32 AM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better, safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson