[svcw]

Your argument is null and void, you have provided no proof.

As previously stated trying not to bore you with information already provided.

Even if you did, what does it matter?

Ok, then I wont bother you with any.

If what you say is true, are we supposed to just forget everything GB has proffered just to satisfy your agenda lust?

I do have lust but not for Beck.

What is agenda lust?

Never said to forget anything Beck has said, the question was "Is Beck becoming an lds apologist" - I said yes.

Pretty simple really.

[Las Vegas Ron]

Never said to forget anything Beck has said, the question was "Is Beck becoming an lds apologist" - I said yes.

Let's start over again, where's the proof?

You have offered none but rather pointed to other posters posts, where is yours?

You mad the statement now back it up.

What is agenda lust?

It's what posters like you and the originator of this thread do to promote dissension, any other questions?