Why do you focus on Mormonism and its “falsehoods” when the Enemy is at your gates?
Shame on you and those like you who have no clue as to the real threat from Inside and Outside this country. Obama is the greatest threat this country has ever seen. If you still insist on focusing on Mormonism, then shame on you, and may your children still be fighting your battles for Freedom long after you are dead.
You clearly have a huge number of filters up if that is your response to my comment. There is no reaching a person like you, even though I have said I agree with you in terms of islam being far more dangerous to physical life (which I am assuming that’s what you meant by ‘dangerous’) than Mormonism.
Just focus on what bothers you and jump right over that. You’re just going to isolate yourself from people all by yourself.
Besides this wasn’t really even a larger question of Mormonism itself until you made it that way by focusing the issue onto it. I was making my comments in context of Beck, IMO and many others, being wrong about this issue and just having the ability to say so.
And I don’t even agree with your premise that diagreeing with Beck, that that is automatically a negative thing. Why is it inherently negative to say you disagree with someone about an issue just because they have an (R) or are generally a conservative person? I’m not going to war with the guy, I’m saying I don’t think he’s right on a particular issue. Lots of others think he’s wrong on this and that doesn;t mean we don’t support him on most other things.
Would this also mean I couldn’t say I disagree with McCain about the border and amnesty issues because he’s a Republican and I am too? I have to shut up and stay silent while he’s wrong about that and a bunch of other issues? Silence comes across to others as silent approval/agreement. I do not want others saying “You agree with X on Y - you didn’t say anything at that time.” Try to explain “Well I just stayed silent for party unity, or not to harm X’s reputation by disagreeing with him”. What kind of a wuss would you look like if you can’t even man up and say “I like X and X is usually right on, but on this issue we differ.” That’s not destroying the person, that’s just being honest.
Forget the fact I think Beck is right on most things. Just focus on the one thing that bugs you.
Just for clarity, do you happen to be Mormon? Or is this “never say anything bad about our ‘leaders’” because they have to always appear to have 100% backing by the rest of us, just your own personal philosophy? You can speak your mind without having people say you destroyed a fellow conservative or damaged their reputation. disagreement is a fact of life, it cannot be avoided as no two people agree 100% about everything. Our ‘leaders’ better not be paper tigers, they have to be able to handle people saying “I agree most of the time with him but on this topic he’s way wrong.”
We hear that kind of statement all the time from Rush’s callers. “I agree with you Rush, almost all the time, but on this, I think you’re wrong...”
I don’t always agree with Rush on everything. I can’t say that either without somehow damaging Rush? Rush can’t take me saying I can’t agree with him on everything? Levin? Coulter? Beck? Hannity?