[Lakeshark]

I supported Fred, I've admitted that. Is there anywhere I say that's the only (or main) reason why I supported Fred? That was your characterization, so you're still a liar.

I didn't know you made peace with the Rabadash followers who have looked up my every post. Good grief, who does that kind of thing and who has the time? Maybe you can accuse me of being a Rudy bot like they did too.

Are you really that sick that you've gone through all my posts to find those two and make your mischaracterization of my support.

I'll answer: Yes. Yes you are.

[pissant]

Nope. Didn’t have too. I remembered the thread. I googled it an lo and behold.

Now you are lying AGAIN. I did not say initially or now that Fred’s “100% pro-life” psoition was the ONLY REASON, the MAIN REASON, or ANY REASON of any sort to “characterize” why you liked the guy.

THIS is what you responded to:

Coming from the genius who claimed Fred had a 100% prolife record, I’ll take that as a compliment.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2598807/posts?page=43#43

And THIS is what you said! Nothing about characterizing support:

You’re a particularly bad liar, did you think up a new meaning for the word “claimed”? William Jeferson pissant.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2598807/posts?page=47#47

Ketchup or steak sauce, MENSA!

[onyx]

Water and oil and there’s no refereeing this one.
The heart of the matter is not about prior posts, is it?