Posted on 09/30/2010 7:01:01 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
For the record, Delaware Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell did not take classes at England’s Oxford University. But the tea party-backed Republican, who has hit snag after snag since defeating Rep. Mike Castle in this month’s GOP primary, faced questions for the third consecutive day about her education credentials posted on Internet resume sites.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...
Wow, your posting history is actually hard left, and not just on the homosexual issues.
I’m surprised that you slip under the radar, but I guess it is because you rarely push your agenda very hard, it is mostly clandestine and one liners, like you are doing on this thread.
You were supporting Castle anyway weren’t you?
Paranoid much? I’m looking forward to reading my posting history on “homosexual issues”. As far as my “clandestine...one liners” on this thread go, you may want to go back and read some of the things I’ve posted - most of them pretty clearly and with some detail expressed my position. Unfortunately you apparently are unable to do the same, so you resort to lies. We’re sorry - please hang up and dial again...
I’m reading your posting history, is is perhaps the most consistently liberal that I have ever seen here for a long term freeper, and that was one of your little gay issues, solidarity posts that you made to cammie.
MODERATOR NOTE and stormer
On a more sobering note, you need to go check this photo in post 42 of this link, I bet that is not the photo that you originally posted, and you should have it removed, I caught a couple more of these last night in other posting histories. They all seem to be dated 10-1-2010. Somebody is switching out our photos.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2550862/posts?page=42#42
That is exactly the photo I posted. Did you bother to see what is was in response to and attempt to understand the context?
But again, what “little gay issues” have I posted on? A vast majority of the threads I respond to have to do with science, the military, or lying politicians.
Then I guess you posted this one also.
Post 40
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2560327/posts?page=40#40
Last night I caught two of my photos on threads had been replaced with those types of photos, I connected it to that assault we were under recently, I just assumed that had happened to you to, I hadn’t noticed anyone here preferring that kind of image so much, we learn something everyday I guess.
I sure did. Are you unfamiliar with the concept of visual metaphor or the evocative nature of photography? If that’s the case, you’re not going to “get” a great many of the images I’ve posted.
That sounds like a clear denial.
Since you do not support “gay marriage”, homosexuals adopting, homosexualizing the military, and the rest of the homosexual agenda, and you support freerepublic boycotting CPAC over the creeping “gay agenda”, and freerepublic’s strong commitment to fight the “gay agenda” we are in full agreement on those issues.
You can take a moment to recognize the seriousness of what I brought up, and was trying to draw your attention to.
I am vaguely familiar that we were under attack from one of those guys recently, and last night I had to have two of those exact type images removed from 2 of my very old posts, images that I had never seen, never had on my hard drive, (all my photos come from my hard drive), and never posted, were not related to the threads, and did not match the ROFL type responses that my actual photos had elicited.
“Clear denial” of what? I have not offered a position on any of the topics you’ve listed. It does seem however, you are quite clearly obsessed with homosexuals.
“Since you do not support “gay marriage”, homosexuals adopting, homosexualizing the military, and the rest of the homosexual agenda, and you support freerepublic boycotting CPAC over the creeping “gay agenda”, and freerepublic’s strong commitment to fight the “gay agenda” we are in full agreement on those issues.”
You seem to be in full agreement with that post, your mood is grumpy, but you are not disagreeing with it.
Yet, the self-admitted Marxist, who is running his county into the ground is considered a better choice for Senator?
People forget that many leaders have had problems in their past.
Lincoln had to pay debts from a store investment that went bust.
Ran out on a marriage proposal as well.
These attacks on O'Donnell are nothing but slander and innuendo.
So, what I would 'prefer' is actual PROOF she did lie, not your own private views on what constitutes a lie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.