My comment was directed to your assertion that darwinian evolution isn't even concerned with the origin of life. If that's the case then why, for example, do Darwinists object when someone postulates a complex genome as a starting point?
Without a specific concept of abiogenesis how do you know that the first reproductive cells were simple and then became more complex, or that multicellular organisms descended from unicellular ones, or how would you distinguish a fossil sequence that is the result of multiple abiogenesis events separated in time from one that is the result of ancestral lineage?
Since you answer to these questions necessarily follows from your particular assumptions about abiogenesis, there is a logical connection. Separating evolution from the origin of life is not logically coherent.
Cordially,
ping for reading later today. thank you friends for the pings.