~~~~~~~~~~~~
I thought I did exactly that in my #21: She ignores the fact that the Genesis account of creation was related by and from the viewpoint of God (specifically since neither man nor earth existed until well after-the-fact of Creation to serve as a time reference).
God's story; God's timescale.
Not Man or Earth's timescale...
It is the most absurd of arrogance for (created) man to insist that the spin rate of [created] earth -- after the fact -- defined the "day" of Almighty God -- before and while He created either.
~~~~~~~~~~
Without the artificial (and erroneous) limitation of an earth-timed Creation, the efforts of scientists to describe how God developed ("evolved") life to its present state (after He Created it from nothing) make sense and do not disagree with Scripture. Kimball starts off accepting the ignorant mind-barfs of Bishop Ussher -- and further degrades her argument by calling honest attempts to understand God's work "devilish".
Linda Kimball neither understands nor accepts the fact of relativistic time.
lIMHO, that justifies my statement.
~~~~~~~~~~~
For a good paraphrase of the above, see mnehring's # 26...
~~~~~~~~~~~
To paraphrase one of my very favorte posters on the subject:
(Nor am I -- nor are you - nor any other creature on this ball of mud...)
+1