[Old Teufel Hunden]

"Based on my experience, those that defend homosexuality usually have some personal interest involved; i.e. either they live the lifestyle, or in most cases, have a loved one that does."

Probably your problem. You assume too much. I am not a homo and neither is anyone in my family. I have known guys that were "out of the closet". Beyond that, I don't currently know or associate with any homosexuals. They might be in the closet but I don't know, nor do I care.

And I am not defending homosexuality. I'm defending people's right to do whatever they want whether I agree with it or not as long as it's not illegal or harming anyone else. That is what personal freedom and personal responsibility is all about.

[dbwz]

The person you’re trying to reason with doesn’t love freedom. He hates it. In his mind it leads to sinning; therefore to uphold God’s will we must curtail it.

[aSeattleConservative]

And I am not defending homosexuality. I'm defending people's right to do whatever they want whether I agree with it or not as long as it's not illegal or harming anyone else. That is what personal freedom and personal responsibility is all about.

You're defending atheistic/Libertarian moral relativism.

There are SO MANY flaws to your line of thinking; here are the "Seven Fatal Flaws of Moral Relativism".

"Moral relativism is a type of subjectivism which holds that moral truths are preferences much like our tastes in ice-cream. Moral relativism teaches that when it comes to morals, that which is ethically right or wrong, people can and should do what ever feels right for them."
Link to TOL