Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: RogerFGay
I was never trying imply that engineers and business specialists are not needed and I agree with about their value. The problems arise when a project has a QC or testing only approach. I am a strong advocate of TQA, quality assurance is not just testing, it is also enforcement of procedures and unfortunately a great deal of project management.
106 posted on 09/22/2010 2:00:10 PM PDT by Woodman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: Woodman

Yep, ok -— I was wondering if I’d erred in that way. I getchya. On the other hand, engineering is creative work and you can’t force or totally control the creative process. The “trick” I think mostly, when it comes to engineers, is to be clear about what you want them to do. I’ve said sometimes that you have to be careful what you tell an engineer you want - there’s a risk he might deliver it.

As for a sense that engineers aren’t supporting the overall process sufficiently - I harken back to my experiences in the ancient simple sequential project form. By the time software is delivered to test, engineers are either laid off (if they were hired for the project) or reassigned. Testers could complain about the lack of documentation and knowledge transfer, and involvement in their QA processes, but the engineers weren’t around to hear it.


108 posted on 09/22/2010 3:56:06 PM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson