Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Christian' Obama Removes 'Creator' From Declaration Of Independence
Sad Hill News Blog ^ | 09.18.2010 | Sad Hill

Posted on 09/18/2010 9:03:00 AM PDT by Sad Hill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: CharlesWayneCT

Cheers Charles.

No harm done, sir. Again, we understand the frustration of repetitive articles on Free Republic, which is why we only add news if it’s “new info.”

Have a good weekend.


21 posted on 09/18/2010 10:41:53 AM PDT by Sad Hill (Sad Hill News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

FR needs a “Like” button.


22 posted on 09/18/2010 10:45:56 AM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sad Hill

Who is this “we” you refer you ten times in your post?

Have you a rat in your pocket?


23 posted on 09/18/2010 10:47:15 AM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

More like Marxist revealed, muslims actually believe in a creator.


24 posted on 09/18/2010 10:49:25 AM PDT by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sad Hill

There you go with the “we” again.

Further, is there any reason, other than pimping for blog hits,
that you failed to post the link to the video? One must wonder.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kd7ZQZxDhjk&feature=player_embedded


25 posted on 09/18/2010 10:50:23 AM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher

That’s where they go to collect their virgins isn’t it?


26 posted on 09/18/2010 11:00:37 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead (Take back our country on November 2, 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sad Hill

27 posted on 09/18/2010 11:02:40 AM PDT by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulycy

Wow!


28 posted on 09/18/2010 11:07:30 AM PDT by Sad Hill (Sad Hill News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sad Hill; humblegunner

Learn the rules. Post in the right place. Don’t use us for an income stream.


29 posted on 09/18/2010 11:09:29 AM PDT by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

Funny stuff dragonblustar.


30 posted on 09/18/2010 11:26:34 AM PDT by Sad Hill (Sad Hill News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Hey humblegunner,

“WE” appreciate the positive input. You made our prayer list.

You gonna take on American Thinker, too? They just posted...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2591807/posts

Can’t wait to see how you respond to them.


31 posted on 09/18/2010 11:50:50 AM PDT by Sad Hill (Sad Hill News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: paulycy

paulycy,

American Thinker just posted...you may want to hammer them, too.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2591807/posts


32 posted on 09/18/2010 11:54:39 AM PDT by Sad Hill (Sad Hill News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sad Hill
They just posted...

Negative. "THEY" didn't just post.
A FReeper in good standing posted an article from that source. Big difference.

The FReeper in question does NOT post content exclusively from that source.

The FReeper in question has no financial interest in that source.

The FReeper in question engages in discussion on threads he did not post.

The FReeper in question does not refer to himself by the "Royal WE".

Do you begin to see a pattern emerging?

33 posted on 09/18/2010 11:57:25 AM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sad Hill

The question is whether they did it right???


34 posted on 09/18/2010 12:06:16 PM PDT by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

We definitely see your pattern ‘humble’ gunner.

We notified American Thinker yesterday of the video, they found it interesting enough to post it, and then a ‘FReeper’ found it interesting enough to post it, again, on Free Republic. Interesting, being the key word.

Apparently, our post was newsworthy enough for you to personally go get the video and post it, further again, in this thread.

We sure appreciate your ‘warm’ welcome to Free Republic, and have noted your frequent ‘kind’ emotionally-charged responses to other FReepers throughout the site.


35 posted on 09/18/2010 12:30:34 PM PDT by Sad Hill (Sad Hill News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: paulycy

paulycy,

You are exactly right.


36 posted on 09/18/2010 12:32:35 PM PDT by Sad Hill (Sad Hill News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sad Hill

I alerted the mods that your article was moved and the other wasn’t. I wish to be fair but I can’t follow every post on this entire forum. I have trouble keeping up with the ones I do see. OK?

Their actions still have nothing to do with yours.

Lurk and Learn, FRiend. Hit the Abuse button and alert the , mods if you have a problem with the site, or post your own complaints on the open forum. It’s a Free Republic.


37 posted on 09/18/2010 12:38:14 PM PDT by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: paulycy

Thank you paulycy.

With this large of a site,...easy to understand.

Love it...’Lurk and Learn.’

Appreciate your help.


38 posted on 09/18/2010 12:43:44 PM PDT by Sad Hill (Sad Hill News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Sad Hill
newsworthy enough for you to personally go get the video and post it, further again, in this thread.

Wrong. I didn't watch it, have no idea if it is interesting or not.

I posted it so that folks who do not wish to visit your blog will
have access to the video. The video you think entitles you to blog
hits even though you had absolutely nothing with it.

We are not a revenue source for your blog.

Free Republic is not your business platform.

39 posted on 09/18/2010 12:45:16 PM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sad Hill
What's with the "we" stuff, Sadsack?


40 posted on 09/18/2010 12:47:21 PM PDT by 50mm (Go whine someplace else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson