Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehring
Vattel is used in context like a legal dictionary that the framers used so we can understand the terms they used in the legal context they viewed them from. There may be terms we use now that had a different context or meaning when the framer's wrote the Constitution. It isn't an end, but it is a means to an end, it gives the NBC argument (re two citizen parents) a legal base to start from.

In context of who can be eligible to be president, there's nothing else to look at. Nothing newer has been enacted or modified. The most significant and relevant modification to citizenship law since the framing of the Constitution would be the 14th amendment, yet even after it was ratified, the Supreme Court still noted on two occasions that the definition of natural born citizen could only be found outside of the Constitution ... as in NOT within the 14th amendment.

154 posted on 09/20/2010 9:45:07 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

“Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American Army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”- George Washington, Constitutional Convention, on July 25th, 1787


155 posted on 09/20/2010 9:53:29 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson