Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Scythian

I took the reason Beck did not want signs at HIS rally was that he wanted it to be about faith, not about politics. The 8/28 rally was NOT a Tea Party rally, either, although attended by many tea partiers. It was perfectly legitimate to try to keep politics from intruding upon that rally, given its subject matter and tact.

However, other Tea Party rallies are SOLELY about politics and about INDIVIDUALS expressing their individual views on the direction this president is taking the country.

Anyone who thinks signs and costumes, etc. have HURT the Tea Party movement, or will hurt it in the future, is totally out of touch with both the zeitgeist and a basic understanding of how visual media works.

These are PROTESTS and should look like protests. What a load, Beck.


221 posted on 09/17/2010 7:24:11 AM PDT by fightinJAG (Step away from the toilet. Let the housing market flush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]


To: fightinJAG
I took the reason Beck did not want signs at HIS rally was that he wanted it to be about faith, not about politics. The 8/28 rally was NOT a Tea Party rally, either, although attended by many tea partiers. It was perfectly legitimate to try to keep politics from intruding upon that rally, given its subject matter and tact.

You're exactly right... we were at that 8/28 rally, and it was NOTHING like a Tea Party rally. To be honest, I'm glad I attended the 8/28 rally, but it was a bit too "tame" for my blood... ;-)

258 posted on 09/17/2010 9:13:55 AM PDT by nutmeg (September 13, 2010 - My 10-year FReeper anniversary. WOO HOO!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson