BS more faulty logic process-the Constitution requires him to be a Natural Born Citizen and he is being challenged. Presentation of a notorized letter or deposition would be met with complete discovery of the subject matter. A deposition or notorized letter is not better evidence than the original contemporaneous long form record and evidence procured after hospital and doctor are known (if any) allowing further investigation for "information that could reasonably lead to admissible evidence" You have been previously advised of this fact and you continue to bloviate....you fail matchbook school of law "evidence" and "discovery".
BS more faulty logic process-the Constitution requires him to be a Natural Born Citizen and he is being challenged. Presentation of a notorized letter or deposition would be met with complete discovery of the subject matter. A deposition or notorized letter is not better evidence than the original contemporaneous long form record and evidence procured after hospital and doctor are known (if any) allowing further investigation for “information that could reasonably lead to admissible evidence” You have been previously advised of this fact and you continue to bloviate....you fail matchbook school of law “evidence” and “discovery”.
Why should I care or be influenced by the “advisements” of a few anonymous people posting on an internet site? I prefer to look at what has actually occurred in the real world, not in birther fantasyland, over the last three years.
While you may want to see the original long form vault copy birth certificate, judges and justices obviously don’t. It was the PLAINTIFFS, not the defense in the Indiana eligibility challenge (Ankeny v Governor Daniels) who obviously submitted copies of the factcheck.org scanned images of the Obama COLB with their legal briefs since the Court made reference to the factcheck.org images that had been referenced by the plaintiffs.
Here’s the quotation from the Indiana Court of Appeals’ decision: “The bases of the Plaintiffs’ arguments come from such sources as FactCheck.org, The Rocky Mountain News, an eighteenth century treatise by Emmerich de Vattel titled ‘The Law of Nations,’ and various citations to nineteenth century congressional debate.”
A subpoena could release the orginal document to a court but no one has yet sought one. I’m left to wonder why not?
Issues involving birth documents are dealt with in courts every single day. A certified copy of the Certification of Live Birth from the state of Hawaii has been and will be good enough. At the bottom of every Hawaii COLB it clearly states the following: “This copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding.” HRS 338-18. Judges and justices are very familiar with what that means.
There have been 73 lawsuits or appeals adjudicated at the local, state, federal and US Supreme Court levels and none have found Obama to be ineligible. The term used most often for these lawsuits is “frivolous” and birther attorney Orly Taitz was sanctioned to the tune of $20,000 for filing a frivolous lawsuit and she has paid that fine after being rejected for a restraining order by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.
Birther attorney Mario Apuzzo was assessed court costs by the Third US Cirucuit Court of Appeals for filing a frivolous appeal. He’s still out collecting recyclable cans to pay his court costs.
And now you know..........................the REST of story!