Nope. When Obama’s campaign website linked to an image of the COLB (fake or not) and then later allowed FactCheck to publish photographs of the COLB (fake or not,) Obama authorized the disclosure of his private information to the general public. At that point the information he released made that specific informaton on the COLB (not the details that might be on the long form) publicly available. In doing so, he legally released the HDoH from their responsibility to protect (and keep confidential) the data on his COLB.
Then, when the HDoH released a public statement declaring that Obama is a natural born citizen, they created a right of the public to examine (see) what evidence the HDoH used to determine that Obama is an NBC. By law, that action alone, gave the public the right to examine all of the data used by the state in making such a legal determination: e-mails, legal opinions, birth certificates, etc.. The UIPA demands the release of such information and OIP written legal opinions concur, yet HDoH continues to refuse.
Thank you for those facts, now what does logic and common sense tell you about the HDOH refusal?
Now couple that with the Dept of State having "the dog ate it" excuse of Stanley Ann's1965 and earlier passport applications..
Next is the National Archives going to hide the Obama family travel records or release them?
Sooner or later lame excuses fail to be believable even to the devout after-birthers.
There's no 'nope' there. I didn't disagree that Obama released an image of an alleged COLB. I pointed out an error in your timeline and your statement that Hawaii released confidential information. They didn't.