Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rolling_stone

When Obama For America posted his COLB image online at FactCheck.org, they publicly disclosed confidential/private information from his Hawaii vital records. Then when officials of Hawaii released statements about Obama’s birth, they too publicly disclosed confidential information. The disclosure of such information negated, by law, the legal ability of the Hawaii DoH to refuse to release official copies of Obama’s COLB.

According to Hawaii’s laws, once you make it public or make a public statement about it, the data is no longer private and the public is therefore entitled to see it. Hawaii is ignoring the law.


178 posted on 09/09/2010 3:16:56 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

Technically Hawaii didn’t release any confidential information and they certainly didn’t release it when the factlack dot org photos were published. Those came out in August 2008. Chiyome Fukino’s first statement about having an original birth certificate on file didn’t come out until October. Her next statement, which came the closest to ‘releasing’ confidential information wasn’t until July 2009, but that information would easily fall under the information that is legally permissible for release by the director.


180 posted on 09/09/2010 3:27:59 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

When Obama For America posted his COLB image online at FactCheck.org, they publicly disclosed confidential/private information from his Hawaii vital records. Then when officials of Hawaii released statements about Obama’s birth, they too publicly disclosed confidential information. The disclosure of such information negated, by law, the legal ability of the Hawaii DoH to refuse to release official copies of Obama’s COLB.

According to Hawaii’s laws, once you make it public or make a public statement about it, the data is no longer private and the public is therefore entitled to see it. Hawaii is ignoring the law.


That’s not the way the privacy laws work. Any of us can give up our own right to privacy and have information disclosed. That does not give anyone else the right to disclose that information and just because of an unauthorized disclosure, it doesn’t mean that any information can continue to be disclosed.
The attorney general’s office in Hawaii has supposedly been consulted on disclosures of Obama birth information in order to comply with the law and the current Attorney General is a Republican named Mark L. Bennett,


186 posted on 09/09/2010 4:12:00 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson