Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

It is long past time that conservatives presented an actual factual argument to the "tax cuts for the rich create deficits" and "Republicans have to pay for tax cuts" baloney.

I try to deal with a couple of the more egregious lies of the Democrats, and then present the factual history of the Harding and Coolidge tax cuts of the 1920s, JFK's pitch for tax cuts as a means to stimulate revenue and the economy, and the Reagan and the Bush tax cuts.

Hope this helps people looking for the facts.

Sorry it's long.

1 posted on 09/08/2010 12:16:22 PM PDT by Michael Eden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Michael Eden

capitalism=the unequal distribution of wealth
socialism=the unequal distribution of misery
communism=the equal distribution of misery


2 posted on 09/08/2010 12:18:36 PM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden

Great article. Very well done!


3 posted on 09/08/2010 12:21:24 PM PDT by Redleg Duke (RAT Hunting Season started the evening of March 21st, 2010!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden
The fascists calling themselves democrats do not care whether or not tax increases reduce revenue, or whether or not tax decreases increase revenue. They want to take money away from successful people and give it to those they feel should have succeeded or who they feel were not given a fair shake due to their skin color, gender, inclination to screw goats, tendency to play rather than work, artistic turn of mind that keeps them from soiling their hands with work, etc., etc., etc.

The democrat party wants display their control. They want to show those who have been successful that the democrat party is in control, they want to show they are in control of everyone no matter how much they have been able to succeed on their own in the past. Tax increases are the mating display of the democrat fascist party. They feel sure that by showing off their ability to take away what other have that they'll attract sufficient mates to retain their control indefinitely.

Forget about reality and the economic effects of taxes. They have nothing to do with the democrat obsession with raising taxes.

Regards

5 posted on 09/08/2010 12:26:39 PM PDT by Rashputin (Obama is already insane and sequestered on golf courses or vacations so you won't know it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden

Wheeee! cut taxes another 50 % Borrow the money from China. Wait, china not buying any more? Borrow it from domestic banks. Soak up that credit. Borrow more money to “create” jobs. Soak up more credit.

Crank economics.

Deficits don’t matter!

We will grow out of the deficit.

What about paying off the debt incurred? don’t mention that! The Fed will save us!


7 posted on 09/08/2010 12:34:59 PM PDT by Shermy (Keynsianism and "Supply Side" economics: two sides of the same borrowed coin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden
a consistent Democrat opposed to "deficit-hiking tax cuts for the rich" should be for raising YOUR taxes as much as possible

They are. They just won't say it because they think you are too dumb to figure out they are lying about not wanting to raise your taxes

8 posted on 09/08/2010 12:53:05 PM PDT by Cowman (How can the IRS seize property without a warrant if the 4th amendment still stands?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden
Good article.

I used to hear folks say that the Bush Tax Cuts only helped the rich, to which I would reply that the Bush Tax Cuts only help those that pay taxes.

Unfortunately, the most common response was mental vapor lock.

9 posted on 09/08/2010 12:55:56 PM PDT by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden
Mr. Eden the argument has never been about revenue, not really.

It's been about control. Always has been, always will be.

11 posted on 09/08/2010 12:58:11 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden

bookmark

and a question. The tarp spending, supposedly repaid (probably some has been). Where does that show up in the budget? Was it ‘credited’ towards 2k9, 2k10, or is it just slush in Obama’s stash?


17 posted on 09/08/2010 1:26:33 PM PDT by LearnsFromMistakes (Yes, I am happy to see you. But that IS a gun in my pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden

“What a GREAT Article” BUMP!!!


20 posted on 09/08/2010 1:52:14 PM PDT by Pagey (B. Hussein Obama has no experience running anything, except his pedestrian mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson