Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
The claim has been made by many on this thread that virtually all our nation's ills are the result of Abraham Lincoln and his opposition to the Southern rebellion.

I am sure the "Nations" ills would have occurred in the North without Lincoln. An independent South would have been spared the socialism and downward spiral.

39 posted on 08/25/2010 9:26:47 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: central_va
An independent South would have been spared the socialism and downward spiral.

Or would have pursued the socialistic totalitarianism of Jeff Davis to an even greater degree. A more likely scenario, IMHO of course.

40 posted on 08/25/2010 9:33:27 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: central_va
I am sure the "Nations" ills would have occurred in the North without Lincoln. An independent South would have been spared the socialism and downward spiral.

The so-called "independent South", as you call it, began as an oppressed country already in a downward spiral.

The Confederacy was created by the same kind of people who regained control in the U.S. after Reconstruction and began ruining the U.S.A.; Democrats!

It is ridiculous to blame any of what happened after Reconstruction on Abraham Lincoln!
54 posted on 08/25/2010 5:31:14 PM PDT by JohnnyBibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson