“He comes here like a fortune teller of the past, or like a psychic knowing exactly what the framers had in their minds and specific what they were thinking regardless of all the proof he has been served.”
Actually, I quoted what the Supreme Court said was on their minds - the Supreme Court belief about the original intent of the Founders. Against that, you offer...a poor translation of a book written years after the Constitution.
“Calling 14th Amendment naturalization the same as natural born citizenship is ridiculous, but it is probably what Mr. Rogers was trying to teach us. Thank you Mr. Rogers.”
WKA argued for pages that NBC was the legal equivalent of NBS, and since a NBS could have 2 alien parents, so could a NBC...and if WKA was a NBC, he was a citizen. They ALSO used the 14th Amendment.
Your stream of consciousness rant was phrased much more clearly and concisely in the DISSENT to WKA, which objected to the idea that the child of a tourist would be eligible to become President.
“Wong Kim, until the acceptance of the Mr. Rogers amendment to the Constitution in 2010, was born on our soil, but could not have become president, having become a citizen, and not a natural born citizen.”
The justice writing the dissent to WKA disagrees with you, and so has every court that has ever looked at WKA. You can whine about the Indiana Courts, but no one with standing has challenged that decision. Not a single state DA has raised an objection. Not a single state legislature. No one.
So you are left with your black helicopter theories, and nonsense about how anyone who doesn’t participate in a military coup is a traitor...
You got that right mister, no question about that, that's the group you and a few others supports and foster!!!
Who is your dear leader's father, and who went to Indonesia to get Indonesian citizenship. And WHY are you so adamant of shielding ALL his sealed records he and YOU don't want us to see, WHY,...huh???