[SirJohnBarleycorn]

How could there have been a need to redact any information in the records since both parties are deceased. There is no expectation of privacy once someone is dead.

They do list b(6), unwarranted invasion of privacy for the redacted paragraphs.

When reading them I was thinking these paragraphs may have been more detailed discussions of her supposed medical ailments. But as you point out, she is no longer living.

[Brytani]

Sorry, had to leave to get hubby his dinner.

Any other revelations on these documents since I’ve been gone?