1 posted on
07/24/2010 8:33:13 AM PDT by
jbjd
To: jbjd
Somebody will be along shortly to tell you to go back to sleep.
Personally I take it seriously.
2 posted on
07/24/2010 8:34:52 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: jbjd
I say that IF a majority of states pass this initiative then MY state refuse to recognize a President chosen by this method, especially if the old method (the electorial college) would have chosen a different person!
3 posted on
07/24/2010 8:58:45 AM PDT by
JSDude1
To: jbjd
Every time a Democrat president is in trouble the calls for this stupid, unconstitutional idea always come back. The same calls mysteriously go away whenever a Democrat either wins an election or is somehow popular.
0bama must be in some serious trouble.
4 posted on
07/24/2010 8:59:54 AM PDT by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: jbjd
![](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v253/chode6/chode2.gif)
no electoral college pretty much means no representation for states like Road Island, Idaho and other states with small populations
5 posted on
07/24/2010 9:16:10 AM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: jbjd
Couldn’t the states not participating in the “Compact” withhold their vote counts? That would make it difficult for the “Compact” states to appoint their electors based on a nationwide vote.
6 posted on
07/24/2010 10:58:46 AM PDT by
Mike Darancette
(Socialism is the philosophy of failure, - W Churchill)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson