Posted on 06/12/2010 11:58:13 AM PDT by unseen1
She was in the same interview with him, that's all.
And I'm quite OK with that. Didn't Johnstown, PA take a similar stance during a bad flood sometime in the 60s or 70s?
And I'll admit I didn't see it. AFN News alternates with two hour spots for Fox, MSNBC and CNN. It is MSNBC time right now, so the TV is off.
Sarah’s common sense was on full display.
define private?
State of Nature.
watch the video she clearly defined herself as not a Ron Paul type person esp on the code=pink type stuff
If you are a Conservative you have some agreement with libertarians...but only if you believe in Second Amendment rights and tax reform as strongly as libertarians do.
Funny thing is that libertarians are stronger on some core Conservative issues than are Conservatives.
But if you prefer to alienate those of us with libertarian tendencies, be my guest.
The stronger the Tea Party gets the less influential the decayed GOP is. And that is a good thing.
follow the link provided has the entire video
yeap and the same state of nature would occur if we withdraw from being the world’s policeman. The Large L libertarian’s do not seem to grasp that basic law of human nature. In the absence of power the strong shall rule.
I'm looking into paying for a high-speed connection. This free internet is....well, the price is right. ;-)
If that were the case then they'd be liberals, wouldn't they?
I hope you get a chance to watch it, Allegra. C4P has the video up now. It is definitely worth a look.
That's what I like to hear...We don't need an intellectual in the White House...We need someone with smarts, not necessarily an education, with strong core principles...
And a Christian to boot...
I guess it has to do with whether she wants to be influential (done, and last week showed how much), or she wants to be President of the United States. If she runs, they will make the Alaskan ethics complaints look like child’s play. If her position in Alaska was truly not winnable, then I suppose she had no choice but to do what they wanted her to do. It remains to be seen whether she gets the last laugh.
Ronald Reagan once said something about. If we agree on 80% on issues, we’re friends, not 20% enemies. Alot of Ron Paul supporters view Sarah Palin as the 20% enemy. They refuse to ally with her, even if it means only getting 80% of what they want. They rather hand victory to Obama who they disagree on 80% issues, but since they agree with Obama on 20% issues, they consider him friend
Hi Allegra,
Am listening to the audio now of this debate.
Sarah is countering on many issues and it isn’t over yet
She differs as she is for a strong Defence, Supports Israel
believes we must defend out country and allies.
Paul is the opposit
Sarah believes in certain Regulations ie oil rigs, etc.
Paul, opposit
Sarah does not want to legalize pot - Paul does.
and it goes on.
Basically where they had some agreement was on small gov.,
and watching the spending.
Sarah said she is happy being a registered Republican.
Don’t let wishful thinkers or detractors sway you.
Sarah is a conservative Republican.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.