Replies

You like anyone else may have some truth on your blog but is it the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Which seems to be your standard?
And should we examine everything you write to knock down perceptions that might not necessarily be completely true in your blogging?
Just from what you’ve posted today we would find your blog woefully beneath your own standards for truth.

Regards
Al

I'm sorry, but I don't think I claimed to know all truth, nor did I claim (as I've already stated) to be unbiased and, by extension, 100% statistically objective.

My only standard is to post on issues I think are important based on what I know about the facts. This used to be called "reporting."

And, as I've said before, go right ahead and sift through my postings on my site. It's on public display for anyone to see. In fact, I even have it indexed on most major search sites as well as historical indexes for easy perusal.

-Phil

No... reporting by definition is the unbiased relaying of the facts. You have disqualified yourself several times just in this string alone by admitting that you are bias.

I'm sorry, but I don't think I claimed to know all truth, nor did I claim (as I've already stated) to be unbiased and, by extension, 100% statistically objective.

It is an interesting paradox that you've created here. You, who just admitted that you aren't perfect, are looking to point out imperfections in others. And you've been doing this since 2008? Years of hypocrisy is not impressive or becoming Phil