Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: freekitty

As I posted before: They made a deal.

If John McCain had won the election we’d have the same issue... as he was also born on foreign soil in a civilian hospital in Colon, Panama and fails the Constitutional requirement of natural born citizenship. It was so nice to hear pundits and media bring up this fact /lol. The “born on a military hospital” is PSYOPS fantasy.

What’s VERY interesting is that in early 2008 the 3 candidates were already conniving with each other.

February 28 Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) with co-sponsers Barry n Hillary in background attempted Bill S. 2678 Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act, to change requirements on the Constitution’s natural born citizenship provision to no avail.

One month later McCaskill is back again w/co-sponsers Barry and Hillary for Resolution 511 declaring John McCain eligible as “both parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth...”

So

— never minding the fact this bill is toilet paper and Barry didn’t even qualify said criteria —

WHY were there TWO Senators co-sponsoring such an issue, TWICE, WHO were in direct COMPETITION with John McCain in the 2008 election?

Funny how Hillary get’s Sec of State. See how blackmail works?

And if McCain had won..what would have Hillary gotten? The one with nothing to lose...

And of course we’ve heard the McCain camp declare “we’ve looked into Barry’s NBC issue, nothing to find”..riiight.

Usually the question comes up, well if such and such (opposing) campaign and management had this dirt on such and such candidate, why wasn’t it brought up?? Because the whole house of cards would fall.

Everybody’s dirty.


312 posted on 06/10/2010 6:47:37 PM PDT by TheBigJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]


To: TheBigJ

Agree. They were trying to pass something so Obama through.


318 posted on 06/10/2010 7:07:32 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]

To: TheBigJ

What bothers me is not one of the people that say leave the bc alone can tell us why leave the bc alone?


319 posted on 06/10/2010 7:16:04 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]

To: TheBigJ
It is heartening to read comments from more and more Freepers who understand the basic issue. Someone on FR reminded me that McCaskill’s SB 2678 was the 26th attempt to amend Article II Section 1 - the natural born citizen clause.

The cooperation between McCain and Obama’s team went deeper. The head of the legal team defending McCain in the lawsuits, McCain Justice Advisory Committee, Christopher Landau, managed a young attorney who wrote a brief arguing for amending the natural born citizenship requirement. She published in the Chicago Kent Law Review. Sarah Herlihy and her boss Landau worked for Kirkham and Ellis which had a senior partner on Obama’s election committee. Everyone in the legal community, and the legislature knew, and betrayed their oaths by keeping silent.

There were five other senate bills proposing to amend article II between 2000 and 2008, including bills by Orrin Hatch and Barney Frank.

Let's hope the election's clerk's claim withstand the attacks by paid apparatchiks and state-run media, but a non-Hawaiian birth is just icing on the cake. ‘Born on the soil of citizen parents’ is the language of our founders and framers. If the supreme court arrives at any other definition they will have further destroyed the Constitution. In the quotation chosen by Mark Levin for his book Liberty and Tyranny (p37), James Madison says:

I entirely concur on the propriety of resorting to the sense in which the Constitution was accepted and ratified by the nation. In that sense alone is it the legitimate Constitution. And if that be not the guide in expounding it, there can be no security for a consistent and stable, more than for a faithful exercise of its powers.”

Mark, unfortunately, is afraid to voice the obvious implications of the doctrine he preaches. With a family to feed, I too might hesitate.

370 posted on 06/10/2010 11:24:14 PM PDT by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson