she has never actually seen it herself thus she also is only relying in hearsay. Why is that? Why won't she take the bull by the horns and claim it as a fact based on 1st hand knowledge of actually seeing it for herself? Kind like the statement that the HI AG approved the previous statements from DOH & Lingle, when in fact we have it in their own official words that they did no such thing.
She had no reason to believe her health director was part of a conspiracy to protect Obama, and neither do I. I believe there's sufficient proof that he was born in Hawaii.