Interesting that as soon as I post a story here these days, a gang comes along early-on to attempt to discredit it. Is there a personal vendetta here? I will report it to Free Republic.
Read the article at the magazine website if you don’t like Burgermeister. And then perhaps you never read the series of articles at Conservative Examiner concerning the crash and the many discrepancies in official reports.
You ‘gentlemen’ are a bit too quick to dismiss anything and everything that doesn’t fit in your neat little narrow world.
“The greatest challenge facing mankind is the challenge of distinguishing reality from fantasy, truth from propaganda. Perceiving the truth has always been a challenge to mankind, but in the information age (or as I think of it, the disinformation age) it takes on a special urgency and importance.”
Dr. Michael Crichton
By the magazine citing Jane, it loses all credibility.
The video Jane uses to come up with her theory that only 4 were on board was a radio transmission on another plane that landed after the crash.
That is a fact.
That is how she came up with her conspiracy. If she paid attention, according to the CVR there were three people (pilot, copilot, engineer) in the cockpit and two people came up to the front and talked to the pilot.
One is suspected to be a stewardess, the other a general.
That makes at least 5, not counting the president and his wife.
Granted there are many discrepencies, but Jane’s theory is just plain kooky.
If you are going to post a conspiracy-theory thread on FR, don't whine if not everyone buys into that theory. Grow a thicker skin while you are at it. And no, I am not planning to ban you, this is just general advice for FR.