Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

This is a follow up to my previous post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2515211/posts

The formatting messed up copying & pasting. Feel free to visit my site for formatting, links and sources. Comments are appreciated here and on my site.

Otherwise, enjoy it here!

1 posted on 05/20/2010 8:57:40 AM PDT by ChrisBoundsTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ChrisBoundsTX

Doesn’t matter. She will be confirmed. Do you think the republicans will stand up to her?


2 posted on 05/20/2010 9:00:39 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChrisBoundsTX
From my files:

Obama Regulation Czar: Organ Harvesting Without Consent

Barack Obama’s nominee to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Cass Sunstein, has advocated that laws be changed so that deceased patients’ organs may be harvested for transplant without prior consent from the patient or family.

Sunstein and co-author Richard H. Thaler outlined the policy in their 2008 book, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Many organs that could be used in transplants are lost because patients fail to give their consent before dying, Sunstein and Thaler note, and family members often refuse to donate their loved one’s organs.

This “explicit consent” should be turned into a “presumed consent,” write Sunstein and Thaler, where laws would assume that, unless people explicitly choose not to, they want to donate their organs to science for transplant or other medical uses.

Also see:

The Future's Shadow (Obama's Organ Harvesting Plan)

That man is just evil, the next step is involuntary euthanasia for those not deemed "productive", you can count on it.
3 posted on 05/20/2010 9:08:11 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChrisBoundsTX
There is another thread today about the liberalism of professors in America's colleges and universities. On that thread I posted an excerpt from a Thomas Jefferson letter about the degree of ignorance about liberty and freedom in Europe (the old world) and the oppression and poverty which accompanied it versus the spread of the light of liberty in America.

Yet, here, with a glorious 200-year history of America's progress, prosperity and generosity, its noble history of being a refuge for the oppressed from all over the world, we have these intellectual midgets of today like Sunstein and now, Kagan, fawning over each other to make us more like the Europe of 200 years ago.

How astounding!

For any who may not have read Jefferson's words, here is my post on the other thread: Clearly, the "professors" at most colleges and universities have, for many years, not spent much time in what this writer calls the "dusty stacks" of libraries--at least in the American History section of those stacks!

Had they spent time in the writings of America's Founders, they would not have been teaching Marx and Mao and undermining the very ideas which have allowed them their so-called "academic freedom" to propagandize the nation's youth.

A reading of the following excerpt from a letter written from abroad by Thomas Jefferson to George Wythe on August 13, 1786, speaks of the lack of "emancipation of the minds" of Europeans of that day and of the necessity for teaching the ideas of liberty to rising generations of Americans in order to enlighten their minds and preserve freedom:

"The European papers have announced that the assembly of Virginia were occupied on the revisal of their code of laws. This, with some other similar intelligence, has contributed much to convince the people of Europe, that what the English papers are constantly publishing of our anarchy, is false; as they are sensible that such a work is that of a people only who are in perfect tranquillity. Our act for freedom of religion is extremely applauded. The ambassadors & ministers of the several nations of Europe resident at this court have asked of me copies of it to send to their sovereigns, and it is inserted at full length in several books now in the press; among others, in the new Encyclopedie.

"I think it will produce considerable good even in these countries where ignorance, superstition, poverty, & oppression of body & mind in every form, are so firmly settled on the mass of the people, that their redemption from them can never be hoped. If the Almighty had begotten a thousand sons, instead of one, they would not have sufficed for this task. If all the sovereigns of Europe were to set themselves to work to emancipate the minds of their subjects from their present ignorance & prejudices, & that as zealously as they now endeavor the contrary, a thousand years would not place them on that high ground on which our common people are now setting out. Ours could not have been so fairly put into the hands of their own common sense had they not been separated from their parent stock & kept from contamination, either from them, or the other people of the old world, by the intervention of so wide an ocean. To know the worth of this, one must see the want of it here. I think by far the most important bill in our whole code is that for the diffusion of knowlege among the people. No other sure foundation can be devised, for the preservation of freedom and happiness. If anybody thinks that kings, nobles, or priests are good conservators of the public happiness send them here. It is the best school in the universe to cure them of that folly. They will see here with their own eyes that these descriptions of men are an abandoned confederacy against the happiness of the mass of the people. The omnipotence of their effect cannot be better proved than in this country particularly, where notwithstanding the finest soil upon earth, the finest climate under heaven, and a people of the most benevolent, the most gay and amiable character of which the human form is susceptible, where such a people I say, surrounded by so many blessings from nature, are yet loaded with misery by kings, nobles and priests, and by them alone. Preach, my dear Sir, a crusade against ignorance; establish & improve the law for educating the common people. Let our countrymen know that the people alone can protect us against these evils, and that the tax which will be paid for this purpose is not more than the thousandth part of what will be paid to kings, priests & nobles who will rise up among us if we leave the people in ignorance."

Jefferson's final point here is important, for by allowing the Progressives of the 20th Century to censor the Founders' ideas of liberty from America's school textbooks, from the teachings in the colleges, universities, and law schools, we have the present crop of pseudointellectuals who dominate the current Administration, media, academia, and now, alas, threaten to become Supreme Court justices.

These folks, ignorant of the history of civilization's struggle for liberty, wish to take on the failed ideas from which the Founders fled Europe. The Chicago political elitist class, one supposes, constitutes the "nobles" Jefferson envisioned who might rise up, were the Americans to fail to teach rising generations the ideas of liberty.

5 posted on 05/20/2010 9:24:31 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChrisBoundsTX; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...

The list, ping


9 posted on 05/20/2010 11:05:13 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson