The sarcastic comments I was replying to, in post #38, presumably carry an underlying message which can be formulated in a cohesive (though possibly not truly believed) statement, and the most accurate formulation would have to come from the author of the comments. It would have to be done in a way which extracts the core statement from the messiness of the sarcasm and ridicule.
This is my assumption. If I’m wrong, the central message is merely sarcasm in and of itself, in which case there is no argument on your side because the assertion has been reduced to “I like to be sarcastic” and really has nothing to do with any debate about Palin.
Yes. So explain how Todd & Sarah Palin are the premier contacts for abatement / containment of Gulf oilspills.