Saying that our law enforcement is "hit and miss" seems to imply that our law enforcement is random. If that's what you mean, I disagree -- I believe there is a definite slant to what we see in the enforcement and interpretation of our laws, and that slant is not to the liking of one who respects our Constitution. There are undoubtedly pockets within the nation where one can often find equal justice, but those pockets are at least dwindling, if not being rapidly erased.
Any reasonable person knows what our Founders meant by natural-born citizen; the Indiana decision mentioned earlier in this thread renders the grandfather clause of the natural born citizenship requirement in the Constitution meaningless. If one accepts that Obama was born in Hawaii, and if one ignores the fact that his citizenship was surrendered when he became an Indonesian citizen, there is no difference between Obama's and Washington's citizenship status. Our Founders knew that Washington wasn't a natural-born citizen: he was born in Virginia, but he was born with British citizenship. If Obama was born in Hawaii, he was born with British citizenship (which, after Kenya independence, reverted to Kenyan citizenship).
Our Founders were wise enough to preclude anyone with in-born loyalty to a foreign power from attaining the presidency. From what we have witnessed in the past 1.25 years, Obama's primary loyalty does not lie with the US. Elections in November 2010 and November 2012 will be important: we will see where most American's loyalties lie. The media and Obama are doing its best to keep the electorate ignorant.
Whenever I get a call from the Republican Party or an affiliate looking for money, I tell them point blank that I will not fund any organization that doesn't have a single member with the fortitude to ask a simple question: Will you, Mr. Obama, please prove to the people that you are eligible to hold the presidency?
I agree.