Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BP2
“For the same reason I cannot accept Obama’s “Certification of Live Birth” as PROOF, I have a difficult time accepting “index data” (really not even that) of Obama Bride and Groom.

“It may have been entered into the Hawaii Vital Statistic records YEARS LATER (even as a handwritten annotation) as a DIRECT result of the 1964 Divorce Documentation itself, which may have been initiated in January 1964 WITHOUT Ann Dunham actually showing a Marriage Certificate to the presiding Divorce judge, Judge King.

“With the help of her attorneys, Judge King may have accepted a Washington State Drivers License, Student ID and/or even College Transcripts showing her with the married name OBAMA in lieu of an ACTUAL Marriage Certificate.”

The release of the Obama-Dunham vital marriage index (which any person can obtain from HI under FOIA) is evidence that there is an underlying HI marriage record.

As you state, it is not an original record of a marriage. If officials have been corrupted, anything could appear in or be removed from the HI records, but that requires a conspiracy (collusion between two or more to take steps to commit an illegal act).

I do not believe that you will find contemporaneous statutory support for your speculations as to how a marriage vital record could have been created after the fact and inserted into the HI vital records.

I cannot imagine a judge ordering a vital record of a marriage to a party (Obama Sr.) to be created retroactively and inserted in the tightly administered state vital records files when that party (Obama Sr.) never made an appearance in his court to begin with!

If this were true any woman could waltz into court, claim she was divorcing you and then get the judge to retroactively create a marriage record for you for a date several years earlier without you ever appearing in court.

There is a missing page from the Obama-Dunham divorce and prime possibilities are the marriage record or Obama II’s birth record neither of which can be released under HI privacy laws to other than first degree relatives for 75 years (from memory).

179 posted on 04/28/2010 9:10:26 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp

I believe that before computers became commonly used - any and all official paperwork could be forged. The paperwork itself can still be forged - but it is more difficult now because of various databases that maintain information. To completely alter the records today, you would basically have to hack the world.


182 posted on 04/28/2010 9:20:56 AM PDT by nolongerademocrat ("Before you ask G-d for something, first thank G-d for what you already have." B'rachot 30b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson