Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: legalwatch

He’s probably correct. Its very doubtful the USSC will overturn this.


14 posted on 04/17/2010 12:14:03 AM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: montanajoe

Whether or not a lawsuit can prevail, the bill is unconstitutional. If not, it’s probably time for a Constitutional Convention.


16 posted on 04/17/2010 12:29:55 AM PDT by Prospero (non est ad astra mollis e terris via)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: montanajoe

how may this be done without creating a precedent that the fedguv may require all americans to buy one box of kellogg’s corn flakes a week?


17 posted on 04/17/2010 12:31:43 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: montanajoe

“He’s probably correct. Its very doubtful the USSC will overturn this.”

That’s not the point...the bill is clearly unconstitutional - but the only reason it might stand is because we no longer enforce those parts of the Constitution...and Frist knows that.

Thus, even if he believes it will stand, he should keep his mouth shut, at least in public, and not give the Court more rationale than they already have given themselves to uphold this garbage. Now they can say: “See, even Republican leaders agree this is constitutional” - and they will say that - worded differently (like, “there’s a consensus now that government programs are good”)...that’s why people like Frist need to simply KEEP QUIET.


57 posted on 04/17/2010 6:42:48 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson