Oh for pete's sake... name calling aside... a lack of net neutrality is what would enable a fairness doctrine on the net. Net neutrality means that ISP's have no say over which site get preferential treatment over another. So in other words Comcast couldn't set it so that Dem Underground would get 10 meg service to Comcast customers whereas FreeRepublic would get 56k service unless JimRob worked out an annual contract with Comcast.
IOW, your name calling skills exceed your understanding of the issue.
So you do support an internet fairness doctrine. What a moron.