[rxsid]

Indeed correct. Now, if only a case with the "proper" plaintiff (with standing, particularized injury) can get before a court with the jurisdiction (that can offer a "remedy"), this is a slam dunk. Obviously, SCOTUS will need to rule on this. Perhaps with the recent District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) ruling, they've shown that they still (to this day) look back at the intent of the framers.

Barry is clearly not Constitutionally qualified as intended by the framers.

At issue now is...is ANYTHING he signed (laws, agreements with other nations, etc), or any appointment he made (ex. to the SCOTUS bench) Constitutional? Clearly, IMO, everything he's done...including the health care monstrosity is illegal and thus null and void.

[null and void]

including the health care monstrosity is illegal and thus null and void.

For the record I have nothing to do with 0bamacare