Awesome post....now all we need is someone to mass send this to the idiot libtard media outlets....
Oh geez. Is this what the homos and druggies have been whining about? Those people are absolute morons.
I don’t care if she did use crosshairs. We are targeting those races and others.
I agree, great post.
Who would expect the media to understand details when they fell for the fake “th” in the CBS faked story. Good ole FR keeping ‘em honest. Just how many experts are their on FR anyway? :)
Take aim at these elections :)
Please send this to Hannity right now! Hannity has that ex Whoring Beckel on screaming right now and he ought to rub the PigMeister’s nose in this and then FIRE the BIDEN!
BTTT
Post would be a good deal more convincing with a couple of links to sites showing the meaning of the symbol as used on maps.
I’ve used all kinds of maps for half a century and it’s not one I’m familiar with.
The only place I’ve found it on line is as a symbol used to show where surveyors should place themselves while working around traffic.
IOW, it’s a symbol for a surveyor, which doesn’t make a whole lot of sense in Sarah’s graphic. OTOH, it’s pretty obviously not crosshairs.
If anybody has other examples of its use, I’d like to see it.
Republican National Committee spokesman Doug Heye, in defending RNC Chairman Michael Steele during a Fox News interview, likened criticism of the RNC’s expenditures at Voyeur West Hollywood, a bondage-themed nightclub in California, to a Democratic National Committee expense at Josephine, a bar and lounge in Washington.
Democrats booked Josephine for a staff Christmas party in December and spent $5,850 to rent the club for three hours. An event marketing manager at the club said between 150 and 200 attended the event.
DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse confirmed the expenditure, and said the party included a talent competition, was strictly for staff and that no fundraising was conducted there.
Woodhouse argued the RNC is highlighting the expense because, “They’re in the crosshairs and now they want to attack someone else.”
I take that to mean "issues" are weapons. The left has only one ISSUE, total dominance.
It is stupid to be suckered into this cross-hair crap. You cannot debate a fake issue. The left does not care.. it's moved on and come up with several other "issues."
Conservatives are swamped trying to respond to every unanswerable accusation. It's stupid.
thanks!
Wouldn’t it be great if for once Michael Steele could take the attack dog role that Democrat Party chairs take and get out all over the media, demanding apologies for the wrongly smeared tea party and Palin?
Oh, wait—he’s busy defending the party’s questionable expenditures under his watch. Never mind.
Yup, they took the bait: hook, line and sinker!
Although the MSM in the US seems to has silenced down once it turned out that the shooter in Arizona turned out not to be tied to the Tea Party, but instead appears to be a left wing anarcho psychotic. Psychotic being the operative word here.
However, not so the MSM in Europe. It is an anti-tea party, anti-Palin hate fest over here now. So much so that it appears that the foremerly readable The Daily Telegraph has got involved in some "tricks".
Comapare these two pics; the first one in this piece from the DT:
Gabrielle Gifford's father: The whole Tea Party were her enemies.
and this one from Sarah Palin's Facebook Page:
It doesn’t matter. No one knows what a surveyor mark is, everyone know what crosshairs look like, and whoever made that image knew what the perception of those icons would be: targets. It doesn’t mean they were inciting any violence, but don’t run around saying that the image is something else based on a technicality.
Does it even matter? The left sees what it wants to to see. After all, someone could mistake these surveryor/registration/crop marks for crosshairs, pick up a gun and go on a shooting spree.
Does it even matter? The left sees what it wants to to see. After all, someone could mistake these surveryor/registration/crop marks for crosshairs, pick up a gun and go on a shooting spree.
But “cross-hairs” vs “bulls-eye”; it is the ludicrous stance that it is OK when they do it, but incitement to violence when we do it that must be taken down a notch, not just the “they were not REALLY crosshairs” defense.
