Endorsing a non-conservative instead of a conservative, for one. But I suppose I should be more precise: McCain has supported and authored a significant number of Liberty destroying measures in the Senate over the years. Yet he is the one Palin decided to endorse, rather than the conservative candidate. Endorsing a Liberty grabber is contrary to the beliefs of many, perhaps most, TEA Party supporters. Do you disagree with me about that?
I agree that Sarah endorsing McCain is the wrong position. I believe that endorsing JD is the correct position.
Okay so that's one position Sarah holds that is contrarty to conservatives.
Do you think there are any others or is that it?
Her position on illegal immigration is confusing, to say the least. She says she’s in favor of a ‘pathway to citizenship’, but admits it would be impossible to force all illegals to leave the U. S.
So, taken together, she seems to be agreeing with pro-amnesty advocates, that we create a way for all the millions of illegals to stay here and file some paperwork, maybe pay a fine, and be declared citizens.
Either that, or she is way confused about what she believes.