Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Tarpon
“To be a Constitutionally qualified ‘natural born citizen’, both parents must be natural born citizens, of the USA.” Tarpon Post #3.

Your made up definition. If not made up by you, made up by someone else. It obviously is not true, and it is ridiculous to suggest that it is.

According to the definition you supplied, if an immigrant became a U.S. citizen, married another U.S. citizen, then their offspring would NOT be natural born, as their immigrant parent was a “naturalized” not a “natural born” citizen.

Are you backing away from your made up definition? Repudiating it? Admitting that it is fiction?

39 posted on 03/15/2010 4:01:20 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
Ah yes ... I think my error quoting the article that said both parents must be natural born was incorrect ... Yes, could be. That would make it a decreasing pool as you said of people, now that I re-read it. Sorry, my bad.

So you agree with the statement one born in the country, of parents who were citizens of that country. Is that better?

40 posted on 03/15/2010 4:08:41 PM PDT by Tarpon ( ...Rude crude socialist Obama depends on ignorance to force his will on people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson